<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Darren Herman - Marketing, Media and Technology Conversations - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-9323a12b" type="application/json"/><link>http://darrenherman.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://darrenherman.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:42:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: One of my favorite days of the year:  TMK Digital Media Venture Capital Conference</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/04/09/one-of-my-favorite-days-of-the-year-tmk-digital-media-venture-capital-conference/#comment-528378133</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome . Thanks for such an informative article . Keep sharing . :))&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venture Capital Partners</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:42:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rethinking What I Know About Formal Education</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/05/05/thinking-about-formal-education/#comment-522002862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My wife and I have been discussing this for some time.  With our recent move, we are learning our way through the Israeli educational system, which is an odd push both towards strong skills in math and science, as well as a more free-form approach to other subjects with far more opportunity for the arts.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In a country fueled by entrepreneurialism, what role will a traditional degree play in a career (as opposed to two or three years at a tech company)?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At the same time, look at what's happening at Yahoo!  Clearly college still matters to many.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Burg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rethinking What I Know About Formal Education</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/05/05/thinking-about-formal-education/#comment-521530985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since it's fresh on your mind, I think you'll really enjoy today's XKCD -&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://xkcd.com/1052/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xkcd.com/1052/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">falicon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 08:23:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rethinking What I Know About Formal Education</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/05/05/thinking-about-formal-education/#comment-521281075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We are in the same boat.  I'm really interested in where all of this is heading.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dherman76</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 20:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rethinking What I Know About Formal Education</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/05/05/thinking-about-formal-education/#comment-521277678</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My wife and I have this debate often as well (ours are in 3rd and K right now)...she's much more a believer in traditional education than I am...I continue to say that by the time our boys are of college age it will look nothing like what she thinks of as 'college'...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">falicon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 20:33:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marketing Wednesday:  Media</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2011/12/21/marketing-wednesday-media/#comment-511956754</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Nice job. Personally I like this article. I think it would be more and more helpful for all those people are want to drive their career in SEO field.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kenne679</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:59:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marketing Wednesday:  Media</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2011/12/21/marketing-wednesday-media/#comment-506303222</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Nice job. Personally I like this article. I think it would be more and more helpful for all those people are want to drive their career in SEO field.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gary345</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 16:08:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 Years.  Tips for Being the Young Punk At the Table</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/03/04/30-years-tips-for-being-the-young-punk-at-the-table/#comment-503919503</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Great advise for any young ambitious professional, I've passed this onto many as a must read.  Happy Birthday&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Hansbury</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:23:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: High Frequency Trading and Online Advertising</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2009/12/21/high-frequency-trading-and-online-advertising/#comment-497830884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well put Michael,  when HFT is used for fungible arbitrage it helps to create a much more efficient market place for all.  Its funny that people take advantage of algos that were writtent to take advantage of humans in this round robin evolution in trading.  The losers often cry foul.  Sometimes they are right, sometimes they are just slow. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">High Frequency Trading</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 18:57:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Ogilvy Was Pontificating and It&amp;#8217;s Happening Today (Video + Post)</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/04/07/davidogilvywasright/#comment-491987704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;fist shake pause at the end was most epic. seriously though.. nice video. amazing how brand vs. direct response advertising is finding it's own through the changes in mediums.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Sandie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 02:30:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Ogilvy Was Pontificating and It&amp;#8217;s Happening Today (Video + Post)</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/04/07/davidogilvywasright/#comment-491601866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very powerful video, Darren.  Great find!  Here's another you may find relevant, Lester Wunderman describing the origin of accountable advertising...  &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/HsPMOs" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/HsPMOs&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LeeF</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 11:11:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does scale mean in an advertising world where it doesn&amp;#8217;t matter?</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/04/05/what-does-scale-mean-in-an-advertising-world-where-it-doesnt-matter/#comment-490631444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;  I like it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dherman76</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 14:51:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does scale mean in an advertising world where it doesn&amp;#8217;t matter?</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/04/05/what-does-scale-mean-in-an-advertising-world-where-it-doesnt-matter/#comment-487490545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post Darren. I like the idea of "audience rental". To push the metaphor further, perhaps the most successful digital campaigns are "rent to own"? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kirby Winfield</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:53:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 Years.  Tips for Being the Young Punk At the Table</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/03/04/30-years-tips-for-being-the-young-punk-at-the-table/#comment-469206042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks David!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dherman76</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:23:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 Years.  Tips for Being the Young Punk At the Table</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/03/04/30-years-tips-for-being-the-young-punk-at-the-table/#comment-469199522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy Birthday!  Can't believe you just turn 30. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search is bought, not sold</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/03/12/search-is-bought-not-sold/#comment-464170665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great points, Darren. One thing about search is that it satisfies demand, but it does not create demand.  You already have intent when you search.  Your intent may have been caused by other advertising efforts.  One goal of advertising is to create intent.  This intent-based approach will capture the demand after it is created. It seems you need both approaches... what do you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Pych</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:11:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search is bought, not sold</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/03/12/search-is-bought-not-sold/#comment-463536859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I always tell people, "What makes Google valuable is that it has the best inventory in the world: A virtually exclusive monopoly on pages where people are actively expressing an interest in buying incredibly specific things - pages filled with people who are in-market shoppers for plasma TVs, for example"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Turns out, the best inventory in the world is worth ~$200b. Good stuff!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent Halliburton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 Years.  Tips for Being the Young Punk At the Table</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/03/04/30-years-tips-for-being-the-young-punk-at-the-table/#comment-456460752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Dan!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dherman76</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 21:25:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 Years.  Tips for Being the Young Punk At the Table</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/03/04/30-years-tips-for-being-the-young-punk-at-the-table/#comment-456363686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy Birthday Darren, you're the man.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:15:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business Plan Competitions Don&amp;#8217;t Reward Business</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/02/15/business-plan-competitions-dont-reward-business/#comment-442023795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Darren, all of us at Skidmore appreciate your joining us for this. Great to finally meet you!  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Forbush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:42:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business Plan Competitions Don&amp;#8217;t Reward Business</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/02/15/business-plan-competitions-dont-reward-business/#comment-439891655</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post Darren.  I just submitted a biz plan to a competition that disclosed scoring mechanism, and it seems to have a bias (not a strong bias, but it's definitely there) towards "can this team execute this plan?". Since we've got customers and strong inbound interest, that should work in our favor!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Eisner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:30:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Data Alone Is Not A Winning Proposition</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/02/07/data-alone-is-not-a-winning-proposition/#comment-433245070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...but decisions should be based on sound data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:55:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl XLVI Advertising, When TV Spots Are No Longer TV Spots</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/01/31/super-bowl-xlvi-advertising-when-tv-spots-are-no-longer-tv-spots/#comment-428699151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that the notion of Connected14 is important, and will become more important over time, but I'm a little worried about that connection mechanic (getting your phone to listen to the audio of a commercial).  I believe that the really critical piece in these kinds of transactions is incredibly low friction (and possibly a reward mechanic, even one without real teeth behind it, like Foursquare's).  Do you think that by the time a user decides to take action, they'll have time to whip out their phone, get the app running, and take a sample of the commercial?  I'd be afraid that they're going to be too late, and catch the next one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The statements on the Connected14 page are pretty bold - 22% of households have a TV with apps, and ~13% of households use apps on their TV once a week.  If your TV has apps, it connects to your wireless network, and it can (with the right app) talk to your phone directly.  I'd bet that there are easier ways to make this connection, whether it's a direct communication between your TV and your phone, or your phone is able to access the last few ads run on your TV (through the content provider), there's definitely something really interesting here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That being said, I hope that I'm totally wrong and that Shazam has figured out some of those problems (or I've overstated them) - they definitely have interesting technology, and I do love seeing involved technology firms succeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Hunter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:05:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2012 Advertising &amp;#038; Media Technology Predictions</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/01/03/2012-advertising-media-technology-predictions/#comment-428645665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the idea of vGRP.  comScore's value proposition to publishers is vGRP will help them surface undervalued inventories (turn remnant into premium).  The concern from the publisher side from widely adopting this is what if the advertisers use vGRP to push down eCPM - only paid for the impressions that were viewed instead of paying for all the impressions.  For premium publishers who don't have remnant inventory, vGRP can only hurt them.  But I can see the value of it for the buyers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:51:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl XLVI Advertising, When TV Spots Are No Longer TV Spots</title><link>http://www.darrenherman.com/2012/01/31/super-bowl-xlvi-advertising-when-tv-spots-are-no-longer-tv-spots/#comment-425611320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you heard of Sonic Notify? They demo'd at this month’s NYTM: &lt;a href="http://sonicnotify.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://sonicnotify.com/&lt;/a&gt;  Toolkit for adding calls-to-action in-stream in video which can be coupled with an app on your mobile device.  Not quite as there as Shazam yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">e.p.c.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
